There is much evidence to indicate that the image on the Shroud was caused by a burst of radiation from the body that was wrapped in it (Role of Radiation in Image Formation on the Shroud of Turin). This systematic bias was neither identified nor quantified in Damon so that the resulting date of the measurements (1260 – 1390 AD) should not be used to date the Shroud. A more thorough statistical analysis (Part 2) than that originally done in Damon indicates that something (technically called a systematic bias) probably affected the measurement values, in addition to the normal random measurement errors. To solve this carbon dating problem for the Shroud, a three-part series has been written that covers: 1) background, 2) statistical analysis, and 3) the neutron absorption hypothesis, which is this paper. But research during the last 30 years has convinced leading Shroud researchers that the Shroud is much older than 1260 to 1390 AD, thus contradicting the results of the C14 dating. 16, 1989.) to date samples from the Shroud of Turin to 1260 to 1390 AD. ![]() In 1988, the C14 dating methodology was used (Damon, et al, Nature, Feb. Later, when the Shroud was surviving the fire of 1532 AD, in light scorch areas, such as the radiocarbon dating area, the starch coating was roasted to a starch gum coating. In this article I will question both this “anomaly” and that there was a repair, and propose another explanation for the research results: the Turin Shroud, already identified as a Pharisaic priest’s temple mantle in other ways, has an internal cotton-linen selvedge at the Pharisaic seam in the sample area the mantle was also starched and slightly dyed with Madder at manufacture, to strengthen and give a uniform color to the temple garment, that – as the Talmud commentary Maimonides says of any temple garment – should look new and was not allowed to be washed. ![]() One hypothesis, based on the unexpected presence of cotton and a gum crust in the carbon dating area, says that the carbon dating sample was chemically anomalous in comparison with the main part of the Shroud and that this sample contained a 16th -century repair. During these new researches, many hypotheses were established to help explain the discrepancy. The announcement of a medieval date opened the doors for further studies that countered the radiocarbon dating. However, many other evidences about the Shroud had already indicated that it couldn’t have been produced in the 13-14th century, and that it is much older. The scientists involved in the radiocarbon dating announced that the Shroud was medieval. In 1988, the radiocarbon dating of a sample from the Shroud of Turin yielded a 13-14th century date (1260-1390).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |